June 15, 2026
June 13, 2026
20 min read

AAMC PREview Exam: Key Info, Timelines and Tips

Author
Reviewer

Privacy guaranteed. No spam, ever.

AAMC PREview Exam: What You Need to Know

The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) PREview exam assesses the professional competencies that medical schools look for. The PREview proves you can handle the human side of medicine. Practicing physicians and medical educators took the exam to help shape its current form.

The PREview evaluates eight core competencies:

  1. Service orientation
  2. Social skills
  3. Cultural competence
  4. Teamwork
  5. Ethical responsibility to self and others
  6. Resilience and adaptability
  7. Reliability and dependability
  8. Capacity for improvement
Graphic of eight PREview exam competencies

Medical professionals see these eight areas as non-negotiable for anyone entering the profession. Schools that require or recommend the PREview use your score alongside your MCAT, GPA, and application materials to build a more complete picture of who you are as a future physician.

Why Medical Schools Use the PREview Exam

GPAs and MCAT scores tell admissions committees how well you study. The PREview tells them how well you'll:

  • Treat patients
  • Work with colleagues
  • Navigate the ethical gray areas that define clinical medicine

Medical schools use the PREview because admissions officers want to see how you’ll handle ethical scenarios. The PREview gives admissions committees a standardized way to evaluate behavioral instincts before they offer you a seat.

Programs that require or recommend the exam tend to rely on it when differentiating between academically similar candidates. If your GPA and MCAT already put you in the competitive range, a strong PREview score can set you apart from other qualified candidates.

Structure of the AAMC PREview Exam

The PREview has hypothetical scenarios you might encounter as a medical student, and you’re required to rate the effectiveness of each response on a scale of 1 (very ineffective) to 4 (very effective). You have to evaluate each option independently in context with the scenario.

Each scenario on the PREview will reflect real situations you might encounter as a physician, such as:

  • Receiving tough feedback from colleagues
  • Managing a difficult patient
  • Handling an ethical violation

The exam also includes a few unscored field-test scenarios based on situations that practicing physicians face. You won't know which ones count to your overall score and which don't, so treat every question the same way.

The exam takes 75 minutes, but plan for a total session of 90 to 115 minutes, accounting for check-in, the exam agreement, and school selection afterward.

Activity Time
Check-in 5-15 minutes
Exam agreement and instructions 5 minutes
Exam 75 minutes
Void question and school selection 5-10 minutes
Total session 90-105 minutes

You take the PREview online from your own device, so choose a location with reliable internet and zero interruptions. Download the AAMC PREview Exam Essentials document from their website before test day to familiarize yourself with the portal interface.

How the AAMC PREview Exam Is Scored

Your PREview score is on a scale of 1 to 9, based on how closely your responses match those of experienced medical educators. The AAMC created the scoring model by having physicians and educators take the exam themselves and using their ratings as the benchmark.

Graphic of how the PREview exam is scored.

Match their answers exactly, and you receive full credit. Deviate slightly, and you'll still earn partial credit. Answers that land far from the educator consensus will drop your score. The AAMC then converts your raw score to the 1-to-9 scale and sends that number directly to the schools you select.

No single "passing" score exists because each school weighs PREview results differently. A score of 7 or above generally signals strong alignment with professional expectations. Anything below 5 raises a red flag and may warrant a retake if the schools on your list require PREview results.

AAMC PREview Exam Test Dates and Score Release Windows

Plan your PREview test date around your application timeline. Score reports are released 30 days after each testing window, so work backward from your earliest application deadline.

Here are the complete 2026 PREview exam dates:

Test Dates Registration Closes (11:59 p.m. ET) Scores Released
April 15-16 April 1 May 19
May 5-6 April 21 June 9
June 3-4 May 20 July 7
June 24-25 June 10 July 28
July 22-23 July 8 Aug. 25
Aug. 12-13 July 29 Sept. 15
Sept. 16-17 Sept. 2 Oct. 15
Oct. 14-15 Sept. 30 Nov. 13

Verify current-year dates on the AAMC website, as testing windows change annually.

Register early. Dates from May-August fill up quickly because most applicants want PREview scores available for the primary application cycle.

If you're applying to schools that require the PREview, work backward from your earliest application deadline. Score reports take approximately 30 days to release, so register for a testing window that gives your scores enough lead time to arrive before secondary applications are due. Earlier windows offer more scheduling flexibility if you need to retake.

How Hard Is the AAMC PREview Exam?

The PREview is not an academically difficult exam. You won't study organic chemistry reactions or memorize amino acid structures. The challenge is entirely behavioral and judgment-based, which makes it a different kind of challenging.

Most students underestimate the PREview because "there are no wrong answers." That mindset leads to mediocre scores.

Every response option sounds reasonable on the surface, but they’re designed to test whether you can decide between an effective approach and one that only avoids conflict.

Just picking "talk to the person" for every scenario won't earn you a high score if you can't identify when reporting, escalating, or stepping back is the stronger option.

Students who struggle most tend to answer based on what feels comfortable rather than what shows genuine professional judgment. The scenarios are intentionally uncomfortable. They put you in situations where empathy and accountability compete, and the exam rewards candidates who can exhibit both.

Privacy guaranteed. No spam, ever.

How to Prepare for the AAMC PREview Exam

The PREview tests professional judgment, which means preparation is about showing how you think through interpersonal and ethical scenarios rather than memorizing material. You can’t study for the PREview exams the same way you’d study for the MCAT.

Start by downloading the AAMC PREview Exam Guide and completing every available official practice scenario. These free resources are the closest approximation to real exam content you'll find.

Practice Rating Scenarios on the AAMC PREview Exam

Most students read a scenario, pick what feels right, and move on. That approach won't increase your judgment. Use Inspira Advantage’s R-A-P framework instead:

  • Read the scenario once without looking at the response options.
  • Apply one of the eight competencies.
  • Predict what a very effective and very ineffective response would look like before you see the choices.

When you finally read the options, rate each one independently on the one-to-four scale and write a one-sentence justification for every rating.

Inspira Advantage's R-A-P Framework for answering PREview questions.

After you finish, compare your ratings against the AAMC's scoring explanations. Pay close attention to responses you rated as "effective" that the AAMC rated "ineffective." Those gaps will show you your weaknesses.

The most common error is rating conflict-avoidant responses too highly. If an option involves staying quiet, redirecting blame, or waiting for someone else to act, it almost always scores lower than you'd expect. The PREview consistently rewards proactive engagement over passive observation.

Study with a Group to Improve Your PREview Score

The PREview tests judgment, and judgment improves when you test it against other perspectives. Form a small study group of two to four people who are also preparing for the exam.

Work through practice scenarios individually first; then compare your ratings as a group. Focus the discussion on disagreements. When someone rates a response as "very effective" and you rated it "ineffective," explore the reasoning behind both positions. These conversations make you aware of assumptions you didn't even realize you were making.

Pay attention to patterns in your disagreements. If you consistently rate direct confrontation lower than your peers do, that shows a tendency toward conflict avoidance that will cost you major points. If you consistently rate "report the behavior" options lower because they feel extreme, you're likely underweighting ethical responsibility, one of the eight core competencies the exam measures.

Group practice also gets you more familiar with the exam format. The more scenarios you discuss, the faster you'll recognize which competency each question targets and what the scoring model rewards.

Work with Inspira Advantage to get help with your med school application. Our experts have over 20 years of experience helping students master difficult exams like the PREview.

Privacy guaranteed. No spam, ever.

Common Mistakes to Avoid on the PREview Exam

A strong PREview score doesn't come from knowing the "right" answers. It comes from avoiding the reasoning traps that pull most students toward mediocre ratings. Here are the most common mistakes and how to avoid each one.

Defaulting to ‘Have a Conversation’ for Every PREview Scenario

Talking through a problem is effective in many situations, but the PREview penalizes students who treat conversation as a one-size-fits-all solution. Some scenarios require you to:

  • Report a violation
  • Seek guidance from a supervisor
  • Take independent action

Having a conversation isn’t always the most ethical decision.

So before you rate a response that involves talking to the person, look at what's actually at stake. If the scenario involves patient safety, a privacy breach, or an ethical violation, look for response options that include formal reporting or supervisor involvement.

Those options will almost always score higher than a conversation. Save the "let's talk about it" rating for interpersonal scenarios and teamwork conflicts where no policy or patient welfare is at risk.

Choosing Comfortable Responses Over Professionally Correct Ones

Students often overrate responses that minimize conflict and underrate those that involve accountability. The PREview isn't asking what you'd personally prefer to do. It's asking what a competent future physician should do.

A scenario where a classmate violates patient privacy is a clear example. Many students rate "talk to your classmate about it" as very effective because confronting an actual school feels uncomfortable. But the AAMC rates "report the violation" higher because patient rights take precedence over social comfort.

Teach yourself to separate emotional discomfort from professional effectiveness. When a response option makes you slightly uncomfortable but clearly addresses the root issue, that discomfort is often a sign that you've found the higher-scoring answer.

Misusing the 1-4 Rating Scale

Most students treat the scale as effective or ineffective. The PREview uses a four-point scale for a reason. Each number represents its own distinction.

  • A rating of 3 (effective) means the response addresses the situation reasonably but isn't the strongest possible approach.
  • A rating of 4 (very effective) means the response fully aligns with professional expectations and produces the best outcome.

Grouping those two categories into a single "good enough" bucket inflates your ratings and pushes them further from the educator benchmark.

Practice assigning ratings in pairs. After you rate each option, ask yourself whether a stronger version of that same approach exists among the other choices. If it does, the weaker version likely deserves a 3, not a 4.

Rushing Through Exam Scenarios Without Rereading

You have 75 minutes for the exam, which breaks down to roughly five minutes per scenario. That's more time than you think you need. Students who finish early almost always leave points on the table.

Scenario setups have specific details that shift the entire context of each response option. A phrase like "your project is due in two weeks" or "the patient is critically ill" changes which responses qualify as effective. Missing those details leads to ratings that feel reasonable but miss the entire point of the question.

Read every scenario twice before you even touch the rating scale. On your first read, learn the entire situation at hand. On your second read, find the key constraint or tension. That constraint is what separates effective from very effective responses.

Ignoring the Eight Core Competencies When Rating Responses

Every PREview scenario connects to one or more of the eight core competencies. Students who rate responses without identifying the target competency are guessing instead of reasoning.

Before evaluating any response option, determine the competency the scenario tests. For example, a question about a struggling teammate targets teamwork and service orientation. A question about a social media privacy breach targets ethical responsibility. Once you've identified the competency, rate each response based on how well it demonstrates that specific trait.

Always anchor your ratings to the competency framework, and you'll stop relying on just gut instinct. Gut instinct sounds good, but 9 times out of 10, it’s just a reflection of your personal values.

The competency framework reflects the professional standards around which the AAMC built the scoring model. Those two things can sometimes overlap, but it’s better to anchor all your responses in what a physician should do. Not what you should do personally.

Privacy guaranteed. No spam, ever.

Examples of AAMC PREview Exam Scenarios and Responses

The best way to prepare for the PREview is to work through realistic scenarios and study why the AAMC scores each response the way it does. Below are five practice scenarios from the official AAMC PREview Practice Exam Booklet:

Sample Scenario 1: Balancing a Volunteer Opportunity Against a Required Lab

“You are pursuing a two-week volunteer opportunity at a well-regarded local clinic. When you receive your course schedule, you realize the volunteer opportunity would conflict with your weekly required lab. This is the only time that the lab is offered this semester, so you are not able to make up the lab. Participation in the lab will count toward your grade.”

Rate each response from 1 (very ineffective) to 4 (very effective)

Answer and Explanation

A. Skip the lab for two weeks to attend the volunteer opportunity.

Rating: Very Ineffective (1)

Skipping a required course obligation for an extracurricular activity demonstrates a failure to meet your academic responsibilities. The scenario explicitly states that the lab is required and affects your grade. The AAMC expects you to honor existing commitments before pursuing new ones.

B. Ask your lab instructor to identify a solution that will allow you to attend both.

Rating: Ineffective (2)

You've recognized the lab issues, but you've shifted the burden of problem-solving onto your instructor rather than taking ownership. Medical educators want to see you take initiative rather than ask someone else to fix your scheduling conflict.

C. Stop pursuing the volunteer opportunity so that you can attend the required lab.

Rating: Effective (3)

Prioritizing your academic obligation shows personal responsibility. The reason it falls short of "very effective" is that you didn't explore whether a similar volunteer opportunity exists at a different time. You solved the conflict but didn't maximize the outcome.

D. Tell your lab instructor in advance that you will miss two of your scheduled lab sessions.

Rating: Very Ineffective (1)

Giving notice doesn't change the fact that you've decided to skip a required commitment. Advance warning is better than no warning, but the underlying decision still prioritizes an optional activity over your obligations.

E. Attend the lab and investigate if similar volunteer opportunities are available at another time.

Rating: Very Effective (4)

You've honored your existing responsibility and proactively sought an alternative that continues to support your professional development. The AAMC rewards responses that fulfill obligations while demonstrating initiative in finding creative solutions.

Sample Scenario 2: Discovering a Classmate's Patient Privacy Violation on Social Media

“While viewing a classmate’s social media profile, you notice that your classmate has made negative comments about treating a recent patient. Your classmate describes the patient and the patient’s condition in detail, which violates patient privacy regulations.”

Rate each response from 1 (very ineffective) to 4 (very effective)

Answer and Explanation

A. Explain to your classmate the importance of patient privacy and ask them to remove the comments.

Rating: Effective (3)

You've demonstrated ethical awareness by educating your peer and requesting that they delete the post. The reason this isn't "very effective" is that you didn't report the violation to an authority figure. Given the severity of a privacy breach, the AAMC expects formal reporting as part of the response.

B. Report your classmate's behavior as a privacy violation.

Rating: Very Effective (4)

Patient privacy breaches are serious regulatory violations that require formal reporting. By escalating to the appropriate authority, you've transferred responsibility to the right entity and ensured the violation gets properly addressed.

C. Read through your classmate's previous comments to see how often they comment about patients.

Rating: Ineffective (2)

Scrolling through past posts doesn't address the current violation. While you might find additional breaches worth reporting, your immediate priority should be addressing the violation you already found.

D. Let other students know your classmate should not be trusted with private information.

Rating: Very Ineffective (1)

Gossiping about your classmate creates new problems without solving the existing ones. Your classmate may not have understood the severity of their mistake, and telling your peers about it alienates them rather than correcting the behavior.

E. Suggest your classmate remove the comments as soon as possible.

Rating: Effective (3)

You've acknowledged the violation and advocated for removal, which addresses the immediate problem. However, you didn't explain why the post is a violation or report it formally, which limits how effectively the situation gets resolved.

Sample Scenario 3: A Patient's Cultural Customs Before Surgery

“You are speaking with a patient who recently immigrated to the United States. The patient is undergoing minor surgery and asks you to contact their family in their home country if anything unexpected occurs. The patient shares the customs that should be followed when someone dies and asks you to ensure that those customs are respected.”

Rate each response from 1 (very ineffective) to 4 (very effective)

Answer and Explanation

A. Tell the patient that, because the surgery is minor, it is not necessary to worry about the customs.

Rating: Very Ineffective (1)

Dismissing the patient's concerns shows a lack of empathy and cultural sensitivity. Even during a minor procedure, patients have the right to express their wishes. Downplaying their anxiety could damage trust and increase their stress before surgery.

B. Tell the patient that you will respect the customs, but that you cannot guarantee the actions of other hospital staff.

Rating: Ineffective (2)

You've acknowledged the request, but highlighting what you can't control creates anxiety rather than reassurance. As an immediate next step, the patient needs to hear what you will do to help, not a disclaimer about what might go wrong.

C. Suggest the patient share their request with other hospital staff to ensure the customs are respected by everyone.

Rating: Effective (3)

You've recognized the hospital may have protocols for cultural accommodation. The gap is that you've placed the responsibility on the patient to advocate for themselves, rather than taking ownership of the request and communicating it to staff on their behalf.

D. Tell the patient that you will ask whether the hospital will be able to honor the patient’s requests.

Rating: Very Effective (4)

You've demonstrated empathy by acknowledging the patient's concerns and taken personal responsibility by committing to follow up with the hospital. The patient hears a concrete action plan rather than vague reassurance.

E. Discuss the patient's request with your supervisor and ask how to proceed.

Rating: Very Effective (4)

You've recognized that cultural accommodation requests may involve hospital-specific protocols. Consulting your supervisor demonstrates professional maturity and ensures the request is handled through the appropriate channels.

F. Tell the patient you will try to find a different student who is more familiar with their culture.

Rating: Ineffective (2)

While well-intentioned, handing off the patient shows that you aren't willing to engage with unfamiliar cultural contexts. Medical educators expect you to take personal ownership and seek guidance from supervisors rather than passing the responsibility to a peer.

Sample Scenario 4: Managing Burnout During a Challenging Hospital Rotation

“You are working in a hospital’s emergency department. This clerkship rotation has been particularly challenging. Your workload has become overwhelming and stressful. A lack of sleep combined with stress is starting to impact your judgment. You are concerned because you still have three weeks remaining in your hospital assignment.”

Rate each response from 1 (very ineffective) to 4 (very effective)

Answer and Explanation

A. Join a support group for students who are facing similar challenges.

Rating: Effective (3)

Seeking peer support shows initiative. The reason it's not "very effective" is that adding another commitment to an already overwhelming schedule could make the time-management problem worse rather than better.

B. Seek advice from other students who appear to be successfully coping with their stress.

Rating: Effective (3)

Resourceful, but not guaranteed to produce solutions that work for your specific situation. Effective as a supplementary step, not a primary one.

C. Tell your supervisor you are concerned that your lack of sleep and stress is starting to impact your judgment.

Rating: Very Effective (4)

Being honest with your supervisor protects both you and your patients. When stress compromises clinical judgment, disclosing that fact is an ethical obligation. Your supervisor can help adjust your workload or connect you with resources.

D. Tell your supervisor that you are unable to return to work unless they are willing to reduce your hours.

Rating: Very Ineffective (1)

Issuing an ultimatum abandons your responsibilities and damages your relationship with your supervisor. The approach is adversarial rather than collaborative and fails to explore any middle ground.

E. Contact your school's academic support office to seek advice about managing the situation.

Rating: Very Effective (4)

You've sought help through official channels designed for exactly this type of problem. Academic support offices can intervene with structured solutions that go beyond what peers or informal coping strategies can provide.

F. Ask your supervisor if it would be possible to have a day off to recuperate.

Rating: Effective (3)

You've taken responsibility and acted to prevent errors. A single day off addresses the symptom but not the underlying cause, which is why it falls short of "very effective."

G. Contact your school's academic support office and explain that the hospital's expectations are unreasonable for students.

Rating: Ineffective (2)

You've found the right resource, but framed the issue as the hospital's fault rather than taking personal ownership. The scenario presents stress as your challenge to manage, not a systemic failure. Blaming the school rather than seeking solutions weakens the response.

Sample Scenario 5: Leading a Discussion When One Student Dominates the Conversation

“Your faculty instructor has assigned you the role of group leader for a discussion about medical ethics. Your course syllabus specifies that each student will receive a participation grade based on these discussions. During the discussion, you notice one student is starting to dominate the conversation. Other students seem to be frustrated that they cannot contribute.”

Rate each response from 1 (very ineffective) to 4 (very effective)

Answer and Explanation

A. Impose a time limit on how long a person can talk at a given time.

Rating: Ineffective (2)

An overarching rule addresses the symptom but may limit natural conversation and penalize students who need more than a few seconds to express complex ideas. Strict rules are just a band-aid solution for a complex problem.

B. Ask the student to allow others the opportunity to talk.

Rating: Effective (3)

This response is direct and polite. However, asking the student to step back without actively inviting quieter members into the conversation may not change the group dynamic enough to make a difference.

C. Ask others to provide feedback on the student's ideas.

Rating: Effective (3)

This is a smart facilitation move that redirects the conversation to other students. The limitation is that the discussion remains anchored to the dominant student's ideas rather than opening space for new topics.

D. After the discussion, ask the student to limit their participation in future discussions.

Rating: Ineffective (2)

Waiting until after the discussion to address the problem means the current session's participation grades are already affected. Feedback after the fact is too late to fix the immediate issue.

E. Let the student know you appreciate their contributions but would like to hear from others as well.

Rating: Very Effective (4)

You've validated the engaged student while redirecting the conversation constructively rather than punitively. As a group leader, the ability to manage participation without embarrassing anyone is the exact skill the AAMC wants to see.

F. Ask your faculty instructor to intervene the next time the student speaks up.

Rating: Very Ineffective (1)

Escalating to the instructor before you've tried to handle the situation yourself undermines your leadership role. The instructor assigned you as a leader specifically to manage dynamics like this. Involving them also risks embarrassing the student publicly.

Privacy guaranteed. No spam, ever.

AAMC PREview Exam Study Timeline

Start preparing eight to 12 weeks before your test date. Here's how to break that prep window into phases.

8 to 12 weeks out: Register for your preferred testing window, create your AAMC account, and download the AAMC PREview Exam Guide. Read the guide in one sitting and memorize the eight core competencies and the four-point rating scale definitions.

6 to 8 weeks out: Download all three AAMC PREview Practice Exam Booklets and work through Booklet 1 without time limits. Write down which competency each scenario tests before rating any responses, then check every answer against the scoring key and read every rationale. Track where your ratings diverge from the AAMC's by two or more points and identify which competency areas trip you up most.

4 to 6 weeks out: Move to Practice Exam Booklet 2 and identify the competency, predict responses before reading the options, rate independently, then compare against the key. Form a study group of two to four people and focus discussions on scenarios where your group's ratings diverge from the AAMC's. Revisit your Booklet 1 misses and re-rate them without the answer key to measure whether your calibration has improved.

2 to 4 weeks out: Take Practice Exam Booklet 3 under timed conditions (75 minutes, no breaks). Because you haven't seen these scenarios before, Booklet 3 is your most accurate simulation of the real exam. Compare your accuracy across all three booklets by competency area.

Final week: Review five to 10 of your most difficult scenarios and re-read the rationales one last time. Don't introduce new material. Do a final technology check, set two alarms for exam day, and get a full night's sleep both the night before and two nights before.

After score release: Scores arrive approximately 30 days after your testing window on a one-to-nine scale. Give yourself at least six weeks of additional preparation before any retake rather than registering for the next available window.

Privacy guaranteed. No spam, ever.

Which Medical Schools Require the AAMC PREview Exam?

Here is a complete list of medical schools that require the PREview exam in 2026. 

  • George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences
  • Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine
  • Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine
  • Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine
  • Saint Louis University School of Medicine
  • Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine at the University of Utah
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham Marnix E. Heersink School of Medicine
  • University of California, Davis, School of Medicine
  • University of California, Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine
  • University of Hawaii, John A. Burns School of Medicine
  • University of Massachusetts T.H. Chan School of Medicine
  • University of Minnesota Medical School
  • University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine
  • Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine

The programs below require a situational judgment test, and the PREview can satisfy that requirement.

  • Michigan State University College of Human Medicine
  • Rutgers, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Joe R. and Teresa Lozano Long School of Medicine

Over 45 additional schools are currently exploring PREview for future admissions cycles. When you combine schools that require, recommend, and are actively evaluating the exam, nearly half of all AAMC-accredited medical schools are engaging with the PREview in some capacity.

Students applying broadly to multiple schools should treat the PREview as an increasingly important part of their application strategy, rather than as something only a handful of programs care about.

FAQs

How Much Does the AAMC PREview Exam Cost?

The AAMC PREview exam costs $105 per registration. Fee assistance is available through the AAMC's Fee Assistance Program (FAP) for eligible applicants. Check the AAMC PREview portal for the most current pricing and to confirm whether your FAP eligibility applies to the PREview registration fee.

Can You Choose Which AAMC PREview Scores to Send to Medical Schools?

No, you can’t select which PREview scores to send. All scores from the current testing year will be reported to the schools you designate, so admissions committees may see results from both an original attempt and a retake. Factor this policy into your decision about whether to retake, since a lower first score will still appear alongside any improvement.

Does the AAMC PREview Exam Replace Casper?

No, the PREview and Casper are separate exams created by different organizations, and one does not replace the other. Some schools require PREview, some require Casper, and a few accept either to satisfy their situational judgment testing requirement. Check each school's admissions page directly to confirm which exam they expect, since requirements vary and can change between cycles.

Can You Take the AAMC PREview Exam Before the MCAT?

Yes, you can take the PREview at any point during the testing year, regardless of your MCAT status. The two exams are independent, and the AAMC does not require you to complete the MCAT before registering for or taking the PREview.

Are AAMC PREview Exam Accommodations Available for Students with Disabilities?

Yes, the AAMC provides testing accommodations for individuals with documented disabilities. Submit your accommodations request through the AAMC PREview portal well before your intended testing window, as the review process takes time.

Do AAMC PREview Scores Expire?

Yes, PREview scores are valid for the testing year in which you take the exam. Schools receive scores from the current testing cycle, so scores from previous testing windows will not carry over. If you're reapplying in a new cycle, plan to retake the PREview during that year's testing windows.

Dr. Akhil Katakam

Dr. Akhil Katakam

Orthopaedic Surgery Resident Physician

Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University

Add us as preferred source on Google

Schedule A Free Consultation

Plan Smart. Execute Strong. Get Into Your Dream School.
Get Free Consultation
image of dots background

You May Also Like

Don’t forget your FREE personal statements!

Get 25+ free medical school personal statements written by our succcessful applicants free of charge. No strings attached.

Claim Your Free PS Examples Now